CAPITALISING ON THE STRENGTHS OF INTERNATIONAL BRANCH CAMPUSES IN MALAYSIAN TRANSNATIONAL HIGHER EDUCATION LANDSCAPE
Main Article Content
Abstract
Recently, the Malaysian government announced the possibility of establishing a Japanese university's branch campus in Malaysia. The most likely candidate for the first Japanese university to pave the way to Malaysia is Tsukuba University. It is part of the Look East Policy 2.0 revived by the previous Malaysian Prime Minister, Tun Mahathir Mohamad. Before this, many universities from abroad have set up various forms of transnational higher education (TNHE) in Malaysia, including from countries such as Australia, Canada, United Kingdom, United States of America and China. The Malaysian Government in her Malaysian Education Blueprint 2015-2025 (Higher Education) (Ministry of Education Malaysia, 2015) indicates that it intends to increase international students to 250,000 by 2025 to strengthen its position as an international higher education hub. Malaysia has acquired various strengths, opportunities and experience based on its past track record, which prove that this task is not monumental. This paper explores the strengths and opportunities that Malaysia has acquired and accumulated to enhance its capabilities as an international higher education hub to achieve the internationalisation goal by delineating the sustainability aspect of the transnational higher education plan in Malaysia. Malaysia, through the establishment of the IBCs, has identified various strengths involving TNHE. Those strengths include regional education hub, ability to attract a large pool of international students, capitalising on the power of the MQF, self-accreditation status given to TNHEs, cost advantage and education tourism potential.
Keywords: transnational higher education, international branch campus, regional education hub, globalisation, Malaysia
Downloads
Article Details
JATI PUBLICATION ETHICS & PUBLICATION MALPRACTICE STATEMENT:
These guidelines are fully consistent with the COPE Principles of Transparency and Best Practice Guidelines and the COPE Code of Conduct (https://publicationethics.org).
We encourage the best standards of publication ethics and take all possible principles of transparency and measures against publication malpractices. The Department of Southeast Asian Studies, as the publisher, plays its role of guardianship over all processes of publishing seriously, and we perform our ethical and other tasks.
- General duties and responsibilities of editors
Editors should be accountable for everything published in their journals. This means the editors should strive to meet the needs of readers and authors; constantly improve their journal; have processes in place to assure the quality of the material they publish; champion freedom of expression; maintain the integrity of the academic record; preclude business needs from compromising intellectual and ethical standards; and always be willing to publish corrections, clarifications, retractions and apologies when needed. In addition to these general duties, the editors accept the obligation to apply best will and practice to cope with the following responsibilities: - Editorial Board
Will generate editorial board from recognized experts in the field. The editor will provide full names and affiliations of the members and updated contact information for the editorial office on the journal webpage. - Duties of Reviewers
Contribution to Editorial Decisions
Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions, and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper. - Duties of Authors
Reporting standards
Authors should follow the format of reporting the original research with accurate data gathered. The author should include sufficient detail and references to allow others to replicate the work. It is unacceptable if the author performs malpractices in the paper. - Originality and Plagiarism
The authors should ensure that they have produced original articles and must appropriately cite or quote if the authors have used the work and words of others. - Concurrent Publication
It is ethical and acceptable for an author to submit or publish the same research or manuscripts in more than one journal or primary publication. - Acknowledging the Sources
Authors should cite properly publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work. - Paper authorship
Those who have contributed significantly to the paper should be named as an author and co-authors. Those who have participated in the aspects of the research should be listed as contributors. All co-authors should have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication. - Announcement and Conflicts of Interest
All authors should include the financier or grant giver if the manuscript or research is financed by the research grant or any financial support body. - Errors in published works
The author is responsible for communicating and co-operating with the editor to retract or correct the paper when a significant error or inaccuracy in their published work. - Publication decisions
The editor should decide which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editor may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements, copyright infringement, and plagiarism. The editor may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision. - Peer review process
All journal's content (articles) are subjected to a double-blind, peer-review process. Articles are first reviewed by editors and may be rejected because it is not dealing with the subject matter. Articles that are found suitable for review are then sent to two experts who are unknown to each other in the field of the paper.
Reviewers are asked to classify the paper as publishable, with amendments and improvements, or rejected. Reviewer's evaluations usually include what to do with the article. The author then sees the reviewer's comments.
Editors should be ready to justify any important points from the described process. Editors should not reverse decisions on publication. Editors should publish guidance to both authors and reviewers on everything expected of them. This guidance should be regularly updated and referred to or linked to this code. - Fair play
The editor should evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors. Editors' decision to accept or reject a paper for publication should be based only on the paper's importance, originality and clarity, and the study's relevance to the journal's aim. - Digital Archiving
The editor will ensure digital access to the journal content by the University of Malaya Journal depository section at http://jati-dseas.um.edu.my and MyJournal at http://www.myjurnal.my/public/browse-journal-view.php?id=39. - Confidentiality
Editor and any editorial staff must keep confidential all information about the manuscript's submitted and review process to anyone except the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher. - Publication and Submission fee
Authors are freed from submission fees. Authors are required to pay the Article Processing Fee, RM300 or USD80. - Open Access Policy
The journal is freely available online. Authors must agree with this open access policy which enables unrestricted access and reuse of all published articles. The articles are published under the Creative Commons copyright license policy CC-BY. - Reporting standards
Authors of papers should present an accurate account of the work performed and an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the article. An article should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behaviour and are unacceptable. Review and professional publication articles should also be accurate and objective, and editorial 'opinion' works should be identified as such. - Originality and Plagiarism
The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works and if the authors have used the work and words of others, this has been appropriately cited or quoted.
References
AEI (Australian Education International). (2009, July). Transnational education in higher education sector. Research snapshots. Canberra, DEST. Retrieved September 28, 2019, from http://aei.gov.au/AEI/PublicationsAndResearch/Snapshots/2009073120_pdf.pdf
Ahmad, S. Z., & Buchanan, F. R. (2017). Motivation factors in students decision to study at international branch campuses in Malaysia. Studies in Higher Education, 42(4), 651-668, doi: 10.1080/03075079.2015.1067604
Azam, A. (2006, September 20). Singapore discontinues JHU research initiative. The Johns Hopkins News-Letter. Retrieved May 29, 2019, from https://www.jhunewsletter.com/article/2006/09/singapore-discontinues-jhu-research-initiative-44730/
British Council. (2013). Going Global 2013. Retrieved August 1, 2017, from http://www.britishcouncil.org/sites/britishcouncil.uk2/files/the_shape_of_things_to_come_2.pdf
British Council. (2014). Going Global 2014. Retrieved August 1, 2017, from https://www.daad.de/medien/hochschulen/projekte/studienangebote/2014_e003_tne_study_final_web.pdf
British Council (2016). The Scale and Scope of UK Higher Education Transnational Education. Retrieved December 25, 2020, from https://www.britishcouncil.org/sites/default/files/scale-and-scope-of-uk-he-tne-report.pdf.
British Council (2016). The Scale and Scope of UK Higher Education Transnational Education. Retrieved December 25, 2020, from https://www.britishcouncil.org/sites/default/files/scale-and-scope-of-uk-he-tne-report.pdf
Briggs, S. (2013, May 27). NUS, NYU scrap prestigious dual law program. InformED. Retrieved May 29, 2019, from https://www.opencolleges.edu.au/informed/other/nus-nyu-scrap-prestigious-dual-law-program-4237/
Chin, Y. F. (2019). Malaysia: From hub to exporter of higher education and implications. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 10(2), 48-54.
Crace, A. (2018) Malaysia: Wollongong Uni acquires KDU. The PIE News. Retrieved Mac 30, 2020, from https://thepienews.com/news/malaysia-wollongong-uni-acquires-kdu/
Davies, D., Olsen, A., & Bohm, A. (2000). Transnational education: Providers, partners and policy: Challenges for Australian institutions offshore. Brisbane: IDP Education.
Dimaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.
Dowling-Hetherington, L. (2020). Transnational higher education and the factors influencing student decision-making: The experience of an Irish university. Journal of Studies in International Education, 24(3), 291-313. doi:10.1177/1028315319826320
Education Malaysia Global Services. (n.d.). Affordable tuition fees. Education Malaysia Global Services’s website. Retrieved August 1, 2017, from https://educationmalaysia.gov.my/why-malaysia/affordable-tuition-fees.html/
EduCity. (n.d.). Iskandar Investment. Retrieved September 28, 2019, from https://iskandarinvestment.com/educity/
Fuyuno, I. (2006, August 2). Singapore pulls plug on US collaboration. Nature. Retrieved May 29, 2019, from https://www.nature.com/articles/442493a
Garrett, R., Kinser, K, & Merola, R. (2016). International branch campuses: Trends and developments, 2016. The Observatory of Borderless Higher Education and C-BERT. Retrieved from http:// www.obhe.ac.uk/documents/download?id=1049
Kementerian Pendidikan Tinggi. (various issues). Statistik pendidikan tinggi. Retrieved from https://www.moe.gov.my/en/muat-turun/laporan-dan-statistik/pendidikan-tinggi/buku-perangkaan
Knight, J. (Ed). (2014). International education hubs: Student, talent, knowledge-innovation models. Dordrecht: Springer.
Knight J. (2018). International education hubs. In P. Meusburger, M. Heffernan, & L. Suarsana (Eds.), Geographies of the university (pp. 637–655). Cham: Springer.
Lim, R. (2009, August 29). Malaysia ranked 11th most preferred study destination. The Star. Retrieved May 29, 2019, from https://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/2009/08/29/malaysia-ranked-11th-most-preferred-study-destination
LLM Guide. (2013, June 13). NYU@NUS LL.M. program ending in 2014. Retrieved May 29, 2019, from https://llm-guide.com/news/2013/06/nyunus-llm-program-ending-in-2014
Malaysian Qualifications Agency (MQA). (2017). Malaysian Qualifications Framework (MQF) (second edition). Retrieved May 29, 2019, from http://www.mqa.gov.my/pv4/mqf.cfm
Malaysian Qualifications Agency (MQA). (2018). Code of practice for programme accreditation (second edition). Retrieved May 29, 2019, from http://www2.mqa.gov.my/QAD/en/types2.cfm
Malaysian Qualifications Agency (MQA). (n.d.). Self-accreditation, Malaysian Qualifications Agency. Retrieved May 29, 2019, from https://www2.mqa.gov.my/portal_swa/list_PPT_swa.cfm
Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1991). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. In W. W. Powell, & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 41–62). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia. (2011). Internationalisation policy for higher education Malaysia 2011. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Bambang_Sumintono/publication/233856897_Internationalisation_policy_for_higher_education_Malaysia_2011/links/0912f50c34d5c5ff5d000000/Internationalisation-policy-for-higher-education-Malaysia-2011.pdf
Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2015). Malaysian Education Blueprint 2015-2025 (Higher Education). Retrieved May 29, 2019, from http://mohe.gov.my/muat-turun/awam/penerbitan/pppm-2015-2025-pt/5-malaysia-education-blueprint-2015-2025-higher-education
Olds, K. (2007). Global assemblage: Singapore, Western universities, and the construction of a global education hub. World Development, 35(6), 959- 975.
Our story. (n.d.). Iskandar Investment. Retrieved September 28, 2019, from https://iskandarinvestment.com/the-company/
Parr, P. (2014, May 11). Students ‘positive’ about transnational HE despite high cost. Times Higher Education (THE). Retrieved August 1, 2017, from https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/students-positive-about-transnational-he-despite-high-cost/2013211.article
Redden, E. (2013, January 16). Debasing the Brand. Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved May 29, 2019, from https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2013/01/16/university-nevada-las-vegas-end-relationship-its-singaporean-partner
UK Department for Business Innovation & Skills. (2014, November). The value of transnational education to the UK. London: Department for Business Innovation and Skills. Retrieved August 1, 2017, from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/387910/bis-14-1202-the-value-of-transnational-education-to-the-uk.pdf
UNSW Asia to close. (2007, May 28). UNSW Sydney’s website. Retrieved May 29, 2019, from https://newsroom.unsw.edu.au/news/unsw-asia-close
Tan, J. (2016). Singapore’s “Global Schoolhouse” aspirations. International Higher Education, 87, 9–10. https://doi.org/10.6017/ihe.2016.87.9501
Wilkins, S. (2016). Transnational higher education in the 21st century. Journal of Studies in International Education, 20(1), 3–7.
Yang, C. (2016, October 6). Ex-students sue NYU, calling its Tisch Asia “a scam”. The Straits Times. Retrieved May 29, 2019, from https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/education/ex-students-sue-nyu-calling-its-tisch-asia-a-scam
Yung, A., & Sharma, Y. (2013, January 19). Demise of branch campuses exposes reliance on government subsidies. University World News. Retrieved May 29, 2019, from https://www.universityworldnews.com/post.php?story=20130117151151289